For example Witty and Carr (2004) noted that people misrepresent characteristics such spil their appearance, age, weight, socio-economic status and interests.

Mental Health

Personality

Individual Growth

Relationships

Family Life

View Help Index

Do I Need Help?

Recently Diagnosed?

Talk to Someone

Current

The Moments That Make Us Who Wij Are

Life provides turning points of many kinds, but the most powerful of all may be character-revealing moments.

Latest

Essential Reads

Trending Topics

See All

Find a Therapist

Get Help

Members

Get Help

Mental Health

Personality

Individual Growth

Relationships

Family Life

View Help Index

Do I Need Help?

Recently Diagnosed?

Talk to Someone

Tijdschrift

The Moments That Make Us Who Wij Are

Life provides turning points of many kinds, but the most powerful of all may be character-revealing moments.

Today

Essential Reads

Trending Topics

See All

Verified by Psychology Today

Martin Graff Ph.D.

When online dating fails, this may be why.

Posted Apr 23,

Romantic relationships play a big part te our physical, social and emotional well-being. Having a good and successful relationship can promote better health (Cohen, Klinkklaar, Doyle, Skoner, Rabin, & Gwaltney, 1998), and even aid ter quicker recovery from illnesses (Kiecolt-Glaser, Loving, Stowell, Malarkey, Lemeshow, Dickinson, & Glaser, 2005). Not remarkably then, most of us seek to find a romantic relationship ter which wij can be glad. However, should wij resort to online dating for the purpose of this? Here are seven reasons why maybe wij shouldn’t.

Internet dating sites suggest us a vast array of potential date choices. Furthermore, wij sign up to several sites at the same time, then the choice increases. The luxury of this may originally seem appealing, but te reality when faced with making decisions about which voorwerp to choose from a large number, wij are more prone to make erroneous decisions. This is because wij invoke different and sometimes less cognitively taxing decision making strategies when choosing from a large array (spil with online dating) than when wij choose on a one to one fundament te actual life. The consequences are that wij may end up making the wrong choice. Our decisions are also affected by the way te which choices are introduced to us, and ter online dating choices are certainly introduced differently to how they would be introduced te vivo life.

Two. Wij only get a part impression

Te face to face interactions wij form impressions of others based on their común demeanour and other more subtle behavioural characteristics. The more information with which wij are introduced, the lighter it becomes to form impressions of others. However, dating profiles present us with only fairly superficial information about our potential matches, which means that wij are not eyeing or being introduced with the person spil a entire. Consequently, the information which wij gleam from an online profile gives us very little to go on ter determining how someone may actually behave ter positivo life.

Despite the old maxim that opposites attract, the research evidence suggests otherwise, and wij are more likely to become attracted to people who are similar to ourselves. If this is the case, it would seem a good idea to use a dating webpagina which catered for our specific interests and demographic group (for example, there are now sites catering for very specific groups, Amishdatingservice.co.uk, Glutenfreesingles.com). Some online dating sites go even further and purport to connect people by getting their users to accomplish batteries of psychometric tests with the objective of matching them on the characteristics where they may be compatible. However, there is little if any vivo evidence that such matching formula actually work te practice. Therefore the best wij can hope for is to be matched ter terms of our interests.

Four. People are not what they seem

There is now abundant evidence that people finta cheerfully and readily misrepresent how they advertise themselves te online dating sites. For example Witty and Carr (2004) noted that people misrepresent characteristics such spil their appearance, age, weight, socio-economic status and interests. It wasgoed also reported that a staggering 13.Three procent of masculines and 6.7 procent of females even chose to misrepresent their relationship status, which rather points to the fact that wij may end up meeting people who are totally different to how they have described themselves. It has also bot noted that masculines tend to overheen report their height te online dating, and consistently suggest that they are taller than they truly are.

More earnestly, te addition to misrepresenting the truth te online dating, criminals actually set up spoof profiles with the intention of pleading on and extracting money from delicado people who use online dating.

Before meeting face to face, wij may engage te a period of online talk. Walster (1996) suggested that online communication can be hyperpersonal, meaning that wij are more likely to disclose information about ourselves, and do so more quickly online. Research has consistently shown that wij like people more the more they disclose to us, and similarly wij are more likely to like those to whom wij disclose. Because wij disclose more and have others disclose more to us ter an online environment, this can lead to more of an illusion of liking someone more than can realistically be the case. The consequence of this is that our expectations are raised before a face-to-face meeting, where ter reality wij may end up being disappointed.

6. Online is not necessarily a quick way

People use online dating sites for one reason, which is to meet others. Therefore wij vereiste have some expectation or hope that this will indeed be the case, and furthermore (especially if wij are paying for the service) that results will be instantaneous. Therefore individuals not only spend their money signing up to online dating sites, but they also invest considerable time on this activity. For example, Mitchell (2009) suggested that Internet daters spend an media of 22 minutes each time they visit an online dating webpagina, while Frost, Chance, Norton and Ariely (2008) noted that those who used online dating spent 12 hours vanaf week on this. Given all of this, if results are not forthcoming then it is possible that users may give up and zekering using the webpagina. Even tho’ it might take time to get results, typically some people sign up for a period of only one or two months and then lose rente. There is also the question of a kleuter of ‘site shelf-life’ If you are on a webpagina for too long (not successful te meeting someone), then maybe people will embark to wonder why.

It is fairly likely that many of your matches on a dating webpagina may be geographically distant. Attraction research has repeatedly shown that proximity is a strong predictor of a sustainable relationship, therefore geographically distant relationships may be rather more difficult to sustain unless one person is ready to budge. Baker (2002) reported that those people who went on to form long lasting and sustainable relationships with others after meeting online, were those who were ready to compromise and possibly stir house or job, presumably suggesting that those who weren’t willing to do this, did not end up with more voortdurend relationships. This finding presents a big question for the effectiveness of online dating.

It may be argued that online dating companies indeed don’t want us to meet our soulmates, they would rather us keep coming back again and again to use their sites, and this way they make more money.

Having said all of that, online dating sites may be of benefit for some good reasons. For example, there are some individuals who may not otherwise have found fucking partners had it not bot for the services of the online dating industry (older individuals, those with mobility problems and those who may be socially phobic).

The choice is yours, but just note that online dating is no panacea.

Baker, A. (2002) What makes an online relationship successful? Clues from couples who met ter cyberspace. Cyberpsychology and Behaviour, Five(Four), 363-375.

Cohen, S., Rechttoe, E., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., Rabin, B. S., & Gwaltney, J. M., Jr. (1998). Types of stressors that ncrease susceptibilityto the common cold te healthy adults. Health Psychology,17, 214–223.

Frost, J. H., Chance, Z., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2008). People are practice goods: Improving online dating with potencial dates. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22, 51–61.

Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Loving, T. J., Stowell, J. R., Malarkey, W. B., Lemeshow, S., Dickinson, S. L., & Glaser, R. (2005). Hostile marital interactions, proinflammatory cytokine production, and wound healing. Archives of Genérico Psychiatry, 62, 1377–1384.

Mitchell, R. L. (2009). Online dating: Analyzing the algorithms of attraction. PCWorld. Retrieved from http://www.pcworld.com/article/159884-2/online_dating_analyzing_the_algo.

Walster, J. B. (1996) Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Human Communication Research, 23, 3-43.

Whitty, M. T. & Carr, A. N. (2006). Cyberspace romance: The psychology of online relationships. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Related video:


Leave a Reply